Programmable Logic, Communication Sector Dependence

, Semiconductors, Tech Investing — Tags: , , , , , — @ 12:23 am

In the last post two posts on semiconductor design I reviewed the risks to Altera and Xilinx due to competition from other platforms, existing competitors, and new entrants. Here I’ll review the risks from reliance on the communication sector (which may finally be a strength for the first time since early 2000) and from ASIC vendors.

Competition from Structured ASICS and ASSP’s

In March 2006, LSI Logic, the first vendor to create a structured ASIC, closed its RapidChip division exiting the structured ASIC business. This was a blow to the EDA vendors who haven’t seen significant growth since the 2001 downturn and have struggled to gain a foothold in the FPGA industry. By shuttering its structured ASIC division LSI conceded that customers are moving to FPGA’s for new products as it is much faster and more economical to initially design a Xilinx (or Altera) FPGA and migrate to the same vendor’s structured ASIC in volume, than design using LSI’s ASIC-based process.

In 2001, Altera introduced their HardCopy® structured ASIC platform and they are now a leader in the structured ASIC market. Altera has a straightforward migration path from FPGA to structured ASIC. They maintain compatibility with the FPGA architecture, but reduce the die size by removing the configuration circuitry, programmable routing, and programmability for logic and memory with fixed wired interconnect. Xilinx has a similar product called EasyPath®.

Reliance on Communications Sector

In 2000, over 80% of PLDs went into communications related equipment. Today that number is just under 50% of sales and steadily dropping. Since 2000 the growth in PLDs for communications end products has significantly trailed other end markets.

In fact, if the growth in the communication sector picks up, like we think it will in 2010 or 2011, this could be a major boost to the PLD market. The other end market segments like storage, industrial, and consumer electronics should continue to see strong growth over the next decade.

Top Semiconductor Companies

, Semiconductors, Tech Investing — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , — @ 4:19 am

In conjunction with the micro-chunking of my paper on the next generation of semiconductor design I’ve compiled a list of the top semiconductor companies based on their market capitalization at the end of 2007.

I have not included vertically integrated companies like: Samsung, Toshiba, IBM, Hitachi, Sharp, Philips/NXP, etc. I’ve also excluded companies not listed in the West like: Renesas, Hynix, and Freescale. Based on how poor the memory market has been and typically is I’m not sure Renesas and Hynix would make the list and Freescale’s market share has been dropping so they would not be in the top 20.

 

Size

2007 Results

Symbol

Mkt Cap

Revenue

Profits

Industry Segment

   
1 Intel

INTC

113

37.3

6.3

Processors  
2 Taiwan Semiconductor

TSM

45.5

9.7

3.9

Fab  
3 Texas Instraments

TXN

41

13.7

2.6

Analog & DSP  
4 Applied Materials

AMAT

24.2

9.7

1.7

Assemby & Test  
5 Freescale Semiconductor

(private)

16.5

5.7

n/a

Semiconductor Devices  
6 MEMC Electronics Materials

WFR

14.9

1.8

0.6

Assemby & Test  
7 Nvidia

NVDA

13.5

3.8

0.7

Graphics  
8 Broadcom

BRCM

12.5

3.7

0.4

Networking  
9 STMicroeletronics

STM

11

9.9

0.8

Semiconductor Devices  
10 ASML Holdings

ASML

11

4.5

0.8

Assemby & Test  
11 Analog Devices

ADI

8.3

2.6

0.55

Analog  
12 KLA-Tencor

KLAC

7.9

2.8

0.5

Assemby & Test  
13 United Microeletronics

UMC

7.7

3.4

1

Fab  
14 Infineon

IFX

7.3

10.2

-0.5

Semiconductor Devices  
15 Sandisk

SNDK

6.4

3.8

0.1

Memory  
16 Marvell Technology

MRVL

6.4

2.7

-2

Semiconductor Devices  
17 Maxim

MXIM

6.4

1.7

0.5

Analog  
18 Xilinx

XLNX

6.2

1.8

0.4

Programmable Devices  
19 Linear Technology

LLTC

6.2

1.1

0.4

Analog  
20 Microchip Technology

MCHP

6.2

1

0.3

Processors  
21 Altera

ALTR

5.9

1.3

0.3

Programmable Devices  
22 LAM Research

LRCX

5.4

2.4

0.6

Assemby & Test  
23 Micron

MU

4.9

5.7

-0.7

Memory  
24 National Semiconductor

NSM

4.9

1.9

0.3

Analog  
25 Advantest

ATE

4.8

2

0.3

Assemby & Test  
26 Advanced Semiconductor

ASX

4.5

3.1

0.6

Packaging & Testing  
27 Siliconware Precision

SPIL

4

1.8

0.4

Packaging & Testing  
28 AMD

AMD

3.9

6

-2

Processors  
29 Novellus Systems

NVLS

2.9

1.7

0.2

Assemby & Test  
30 Intersil

ISIL

2.9

0.7

0.1

Analog  
31 LSI

LSI

2.8

2.4

-0.4

ASIC  
32 ARM Holdings

ARMHY

2.8

0.5

0.1

Processors  

Programmable Logic, The Next Generation of Semiconductor Design

, Semiconductors, Tech Investing — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , — @ 2:36 am

I recently finished a paper on investment opportunities in the next generation of semiconductor design and how it favors Xilinx, Altera, and to a lesser extent Microchip. Since this is a blog I will micro-chunk the papers content over several posts. The thesis of this paper is that semiconductor design will be based more around an integrated design and manufacturing platform than the historical approach of cobbling together various vendors’ offerings based on best of breed research. Similar to how IT departments have consolidated around only a handful of vendors semiconductor designers are consolidating around the major vendors’ platforms.

Since the bursting of the .com and telecom bubbles in 2000 the technology infrastructure market has evolved from a high growth industry into the cash cow phase. Winners such as Cisco, EMC, and Xilinx have tremendous free cash flow. While losers like 3Com and LSI are struggling to survive. With technology products especially there is little value purchasing second tier products so the leading companies only grow stronger until the next major secular inflection point. New startups are reduced to only attack market niches. For digital semiconductor chips as well as IP networking and storage the next secular inflection point is probably a decade or more in the future.

In this paper (and subsequent blogs) I will explain how the structure of the semiconductor market is going vertical due to the dramatic increase in semiconductor complexity requiring semiconductor design integration and how this favors the two leading FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) companies. The next generation semiconductor products will be designed using Xilinx and Altera’s platforms.

A major acceleration in growth of the FPGA market should occur in 2010 based on several factors listed below. The two companies that control approximately 85% of the FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) market are positioned to exploit this inflection point in growth.

  • When 65nm devices go mainstream
    • FPGA’s as SoC (for embedded systems), especially with ARM and MIPS soft-core processors
    • The continued acceleration of FPGA’s stealing market share from ASICs and ASSPs
  • FPGA’s in new markets
    • x86 servers and PCs
    • Industrial & Automotive
    • Consumer devices
  • Beginning of construction for the next generation communication network driven by
    • The communication equipment is nearly half of the FPGA end market
    • The glut of dark fiber from the .com bubble will be in use
    • The explosion of true mobility due to 802.11n, WiMax, LTE, etc
    • The explosion of interactive TV (through high definition video over IP) enabled by fiber to the home
    • The virtualization of the data center, including desktops
  • The end of the global slowdown, re-invigorating world-wide growth of capital goods products, which are increasingly designed with digital devices like FPGAs